The grades should be in sync with the film if you run it inside Fortius software but there will not be any map data. Mike if he has a pgmf file for it it must be for the old Fortius Software, so the film in the question of the Mortirolo must be older then 2007. Seems to work well at that point and lets me ride the actual gavia pass instead of something a bit too short. I'm replacing the pgmf with my own gpx (gps route file) and rejiggering the rlv so the distance->video mapping matches the gpx. The tacx files for the a consist of an rlv (distance to video frame mapping), a pgmf (distance to slope mapping) and an avi (video). I'm not talking about making a new video but adapting older tacx video to work as a more 'modern' virtual ride simulation, like when you're done you could upload your ride to strava. The dvd I'm using now is Giro Del Mortirolo from tacx. The older tacx dvds that I have don't match reality. His are great because he recorded the gpx when he made the video so all the data agrees. You may find that making videos is a heck of a lot of work. There are some very old videos used with early versions of the older Fortius and subsequent TTS1 and TTS2 software that were more basic. Not sure what specific videos you are referring to. Those old crufty tacx videos are fine, its just all the auxiliary data isn't so great. I'd love it if someone had already done this. Nothing bursts your bubble like seeing a steep climb but the trainer thinks youre descending.Īt this point when I want to try a new ride I must creating a gpx for the route then repair the video sync so it works for me. I don't know that it needed 21 but I put a mark at all the places where I'd care if it was out of sync. The benefit of this over a simple linear interpolate is that it retains the relative speed of the recording vehicle between the fact points.įor the tacx gavia ride I was able to bring it into sync with 21 points. I give it a set of points that I consider facts: and it interpolates all the points in the rlv so my facts become true. I played with some route editor from cyclops for a whole day but it was hugely frustrating.įinally I just wrote a small command line program to rewrite existing rlvs distance/video mapping. I've seen references to "RLV Studio" and "RLV Workbench" but the sites seem to be gone now. What is bothering me now is that the tacx video has gaps and the 'tacx distance' doesn't map to reality which cause the videos to fall out of sync. I also added a kinetic energy model to golden cheetah so the climbs are now properly difficult. I created a gpx for a ride by consolidating strava rides which means I can now see my route when I'm done, as if I'd ridden it with strava. The tacx rlv only have a distance/slope map and a distance/frame map, which isn't so satisfying for me. I recently was given a few old tacx dvds and thought I'd give them a go. If so can anyone point me to a better place to discuss this stuff? Seems like this is the best forum on the web for this stuff. I'm completely new to the virtual ride community. See the GNU General Public License forġ5 * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License alongġ6 * with this program if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 51ġ7 * Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USAġ8 */ 19 20 # ifndef _VideoSyncFile_h 21 # define _VideoSyncFile_h 22 # include "GoldenCheetah.h" 23 # include "Context.h" 24 25 # include 26 # include 27 # include 28 # include 29 # include 30 # include 31 # include 32 # include 33 # include 34 35 // which section of the file are we in?ģ6 # define NOMANSLAND 0 37 # define SETTINGS 1 38 # define DATA 2 39 # define END 3 40 41 // is this in. 0 complexity | 943949478488f21eb80d33ae0e3bff7e MD5 |Ģ * Copyright (c) 2009 Mark Liversedge * Copyright (c) 2015 Vianney Boyer *ĥ * This program is free software you can redistribute it and/or modify itĦ * under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Freeħ * Software Foundation either version 2 of the License, or (at your option)ġ0 * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUTġ1 * ANY WARRANTY without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY orġ2 * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |